Dasgupta S, Kelleman M, Whitehill R, Fischbach P.
Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J. 2020 Apr 18. pii: S0972-6292(20)30044-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ipej.2020.04.007. [Epub ahead of print]
PMID: 32311435 Free Article
Select item 32312518
Background: Cryoablation for atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) is effective and safe with a reported limitation of lower success and higher recurrence rates. We have observed cases in which slow pathway conduction was eliminated as demonstrated by atrial extra-stimulus testing within 1 min of cryo-energy delivery but returned following tissue rewarming. Frequently, slow pathway conduction persisted despite multiple acutely successful lesions over a broad anatomic region. We aimed to determine if return of slow pathway conduction after elimination during cryoablation represents a risk for recurrent AVNRT with the same intermediate term results as slow pathway ablation. We hypothesize that remnant single echo beats in the absence of sustained slow pathway conduction and inducible AVNRT is an acceptable end point after clear slow pathway elimination during cryoablation.
Methods: Retrospective chart review of patients undergoing attempted slow pathway ablation for AVNRT using solely cryoablation between January 2015-January 2018.
Results: Forty-four patients met inclusion criteria with at-least 2 features of dual AVN physiology. 19 patients had return of slow pathway conduction shortly after clear elimination during cryoablation (Group A) while 25 did not (Group B). All in Group A had recurrent single echo beats but none had sustained slow pathway conduction at the end of the procedure nor AVNRT recurrence at 1 year.
Conclusion: Recurrent single echo beats with absent sustained slow pathway conduction and non-inducible AVNRT may be an acceptable endpoint for slow pathway ablation of AVNRT using cryoablation when there is elimination of slow pathway demonstrated during energy delivery.